Utah v. Micone, No. 2:23-CV-016-Z, __ F. Supp. 3d __, 2025 WL 510331 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 14, 2025) (Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk)
On Valentine’s Day, Judge Kacsmaryk issued what to many was a surprising decision affirming the validity of the most recent regulation on a fiduciary’s consideration of non-pecuniary factors in making investment option
The big news this week is not a decision, but the oral argument before the Supreme Court in Cunningham v. Cornell University, an excessive fee case brought by a class of 28,000 participants in Cornell’s 403(b) employee retirement plan. The case made its way to the Supreme Court on a seemingly narrow question: “Whether
Cockerill v. Corteva, Inc., No. CV 21-3966, 2024 WL 5159892 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2024) (Judge Michael M. Baylson)
We at Your ERISA Watch had intended to take last week and this week off for the holidays, but good news is always worth sharing, especially for the New Year. In that spirit, we are