Cunningham v. Cornell Univ., No. 23-1007, __ S. Ct. __, 2025 WL 1128943 (U.S. Apr. 17, 2025)
As Your ERISA Watch readers probably know, ERISA litigation often entails a surprising number pf peculiar, court-created rules not applied in any other context. But not for the first time, the Supreme Court this week rejected the
Cannon v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mass., No. 24-1862, __ F. 4th __, 2025 WL 855194 (1st Cir. Mar. 19, 2025) (Before Circuit Judges Aframe, Lynch, and Howard)
As our readers undoubtedly know, ERISA contains a notably broad preemption provision designed to ensure that, for the most part, employee benefits are
McManus v. The Clorox Co., No. 4:23-CV-05325-YGR, 2025 WL 732087 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2025) (Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers)
Our case of the week is one in a series of recently filed cases presenting novel challenges to “a practice by which retirement plan administrators use forfeited plan funds to reduce their own administrative expenses